"Mortdecai" Movie Review

[Originally uploaded Jan. 27th, 2015]

Well... It could have been worse... And I really wanted to like this one, too....

"Mortdecai" is a comedy that follows Charles Mortdecai (played by Johnny Depp) as travels around the globe trying to find a stolen piece of art, that also has ties to a hidden bank account that allegedly holds Nazi gold.
The movie showcases an all star cast. In addition to Depp, there is Gwyneth Paltrow, Ewan McGregor, Olivia Munn, Paul Bettany, Jeff Goldblum, and others. But, even though there are a lot of big name actors and actresses, the story was kind of... well, flat.
The story itself feels a little over done. And by over done, I mean it's been used in all of the Pink Panther movies. However, instead of Peter Sellers playing the bumbling inspector Clouseau, we have Depp playing the bumbling [criminal?] art aficionado Mortdecai.
I've noticed on the website Rotten Tomatoes "Mortdecai" has received a 17% rating, and I can see why. The movie wasn't atrocious or completely unfunny, but a lot of the humor was either really bland and/or juvenile, the lines are forgettable, and the characters just aren't that interesting. The actors gave good performances; if anyone else had been cast in their place the movie probably would have been a big flop- but even with their performances, the movie just wasn't all that engaging. I can't help but feel that the actors in this movie were entirely too good for it.
I know a lot of people have been saying that this isn't one of Depp's best performances. I would have to disagree to an extent. While the jokes were stale and the story was bland, Depp really did give an interesting performance. He was probably the most interesting thing in the movie, to say the least. I've always been a fan of Mr. Depp, and it's good to see him stepping away from the Tim Burton and Pirate realm where he's been for the past decade or so, and go back to some of the more quirky and different roles that made him famous in the first place. While I would still love to see him in more power-house roles like the ones he had in "What's Eating Gilbert Grape" and "Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas", it still is good to see something that isn't pale faced, or asking where the rum has gone.
The other characters were fairly forgettable, though. In fact I've already had to look at the IMDB page just to be reminded of their names. Gwyneth Paltrow plays Mortdecai's wife Johanna, who is the smart and sexy pants-wearer of the relationship. Throughout most of the movie Mortdecai and his wife are having marital issues that revolve around his mustache. Yep. Granted, the mustache is a bit on the dated and odd side, but really? Another factor in their dinged relationship is the fact that they're flat broke and need to make money. Now, that would be

enough to put a wedge in things, but the movie seems to focus on mustachio marital strife.
Ewan McGregor plays Alistair Martland, an inspector who went to college with Mortdecai and Johanna, of whom he is still insanely in love with. That makes for a little contention between the Charles and Alistair, but not enough to really be considered funny. The main joke with Martland is that he wants desperately to have an affair with Lady Mortdecai and always gets shot down for one reason or another.
Paul Bettany plays Mortdecai's manservant/bodyguard Jock, who is pretty much the Kano to Depp's Clouseau. The main on-going joke about Jock is that not only is he always there to save Mortdecai's ass and also get his kicked in the process, but he's really into having sex. Again,

nothing super funny about that, nor surprising.
Those are the main characters. Then you have secondary characters like Munn and Goldblum that show up halfway through the film and really, were just used as plot devices and not actual characters. Which I get- not every character can have the main spotlight, but honestly, you could probably keep them nameless or cut them out of the movie entirely and still about the same amount of half-humor that you have with them in it.

All in all, "Mortdecai" has a few chuckles, but I would be lying if I said I had any big laughs from it. It's not the worst movie I've ever seen but it's definitely not the best. Probably on the lower end of the mediocre movies I've seen. If you want to see Depp in a quirky role, it's worth checking out, but I would honestly suggest seeing "Tusk" or "Into the Woods" instead- he plays minor characters there, and are just as enjoyable (one more so than the others) than his full length role as Mortdecai.

"Into The Woods" Movie Review

[Originally posted Jan. 19th, 2015]

"Into the Woods" is the newest musical romp brought to the big screen by Disney. This stage-to-screen adaptation is directed by Rob Marshall, the Oscar award winning director of "Chicago", and the producers of the Tony Award winning musical "Wicked". "Into the Woods" follows the interweaving stories of a baker and his wife, as well as various fairy tale characters who are all on a quest to get the things they want.

The story of "Into the Woods" stays true to a lot of the original source material (by that I mean it stays true to the Brothers' Grimm stories), which I personally feel was a bold move for Disney to take since they've basically been responsible for pioneering and monopolizing what we all know when it comes to fairy tales. For those who don't know, fairy tales were originally created to be used as a way of teaching kids about the harsh realities of the world around them. The Broadway production of "Into the Woods" embraced that form of story telling through lyrical songs and an interweaving story lines that bring each of the stories' perspectives into one cohesive web of wisdom, I guess you could say.

THE PLOT:

The story, as I mentioned, follows the stories of multiple different fairy tale characters. The movie starts with Cinderella wishing she could go to the king's festival, Jack and his mother discussing selling their cow, Red Riding Hood getting ready to go see her granny in the woods, and a baker and his wife wishing they had a child. As the baker and his wife are working in the bakery, their neighbor who just so happens to be a witch, busts in the door, and tells them that there is a curse that was placed on their household that will prevent them from ever having children. The witch, however, says that if they can gather different items for her in 3 days time before the Blue Moon, she will reverse the curse and they can get a child. The items consist of a cape as red as blood, a cow as white as milk, a slipper as pure as gold, and hair as yellow as corn.

So yeah, basically the story is an A-typical magical scavenger hunt, and the movie seems to give every character an arch, and everyone gets their wish at the end. Seems, being the key word there.

The first half of the movie is the whimsical, fun and fairy-taleish portion of the story. The second half however is when most of the symbolism comes into play and shit gets real. Upon doing

The Baker and his Wife meet Jack in the woods
[found on Google Images]

some research into the history of the play I learned that while it has been a Broadway success and he been taken to different theatres around the world, as well as been a production for local drama troups and high schools alike, sometimes the 2nd act is never preformed- a lot of people just cut it off at the conclusion of the first because the dreary and destructive tone of the 2nd act would be a "buzzkill" or a "downer" for the audience to sit through. True, the 2nd half is a lot more serious than the first, I believe that is where a lot of the symbolism comes into play in the story, as well as showing the audience that yes, good things happen and wishes come true. But, you need to be careful what you wish for, because sometimes it can bring about unforeseen consequences. And even if everything seems bleak there is always, always, ALWAYS hope.

Now, I'm not saying that the rest of the story isn't chock full of symbolism, however. For example, let's look at the story of Red Riding Hood. The originally story was used as an allegory of a girl becoming sexually mature (red cape- hello!) and losing her virginity to a stanger. Back in the day, this wasn't proper behavior, but it used story telling to prepare girls for this very real experience that is something they would have to face in their adult lives. Now, normally the story is portrayed as purely metaphorical. In "Into The Woods" they do NOT beat around the bush with that shit. The wolf, who is played by a zoot suit wearing Johnny Depp, is BARELY subtle with his performance. Great and totally enjoyable, but it's clear what he's wanting Red for. Eating, of course! *cough cough* And in the musical number "I Know Things Now" Red recounts her experience with the wolf to the Baker who rescued her by describing it as exciting and scary. I'm pretty sure we can all say that about our first times getting sexual, amiright?

The other characters are also just as allegorical in concept. Let's look at Cinderella for example. Over the course of the story, she starts off as a wishful girl who is stuck in a situation

Rapunzel [found on Google Images]

that is less desirable. She gets a chance to experience something much better than she had before, but can't decide if that's what she really wants. By the end of the story, she learns who she is, what her boundaries are, and finds peace with that instead of being a wishy-washy type of girl.

Jack represents the essence of all little boys- adventurous, curious, and again, daydreamie and wishful. However, he doesn't exactly think about the repercussions of his actions, and actually gets into huge trouble because of his actions. So his character arch really revolves around taking accountability with his actions.

The baker's wife also sees an important shift of her character as she is probably the most morally questionable character of the story, as she will stop at nothing to get what she wants. Which is something we've all been taught to root for when it comes to fairy tales, but as she learns, sometimes you will be able to get what you want, but sometimes you don't realize what blessings you have and take them for granted because you just keep wanting more and more. Emily Blunt brings this character to life, and you just can't help but sympathize with her character.

And my personal favorite character would have to be the witch played by the amazing Meryl Streep. This character not only works as a ticking clock, the comedic relief, but she also has a lot of the more emotional moments in the movie. I'm not one to cry in a movie, but I really teared up during her performance of "Stay With Me", where she's basically telling her daughter (Rapunzel) who is getting older and wanting to see the world, that she loves her and that she doesn't want her to leave the comfort of home and her loving embrace. True, she doesn't go about parenting the best way, but in reality, what parent doesn't make mistakes? What parent

Meryl Streep as The Witch and James Corden as The Baker
[found on Google Images]

doesn't try their hardest to make sure their kids are safe and away from harm? True, she goes to an extreme about it, but really, what parent can honestly say that taking their child's protection to an extreme hasn't crossed their minds at least once?

And while I'm on the subject of parenting, there is an almost universal theme with this musical when it comes to mothers. Each character whether they themselves are mothers, or they are have mothers, they miss their mothers, whatever- there is a deep maternal feeling to the movie. In the second act of the play when death and destruction are everywhere, the motherly characters we were introduced to in the 1st half of the play all die. But it's when they leave, they also pave the way for the other characters to step up and become mature, and sometimes motherly figures themselves.


Ultimately, I've got to give this movie 5 stars. It's brilliantly written, brilliantly acted, brilliantly performed- it was great. A lot of people have been fairly split when it comes to this movie, and I don't want to come across as snooty or whatever, but they clearly didn't see the movie for what it was supposed to be. It's not a story about specific characters- if you want that, stick with the Disney versions of the fairy tales. Not that there's anything wrong with the Disney fairy tales- they took the base material of the story, and added relatable characters that you can see grow in the course of the film. While "Into the Woods" does have characters, they're more figurative and not so much actual. While Disney's Cinderella is a relatable CHARACTER, the "Into the Woods" Cinderella is a relatable SITUATION. Each of the characters aren't so much a character, just a personification of a situation or lesson everyone has to learn. Of course, this is all my opinion so feel free to take it or leave it.

All in all, great movie- well worth checking out.